Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Lower bayesian confidence limits on the process capability index cpm: A comparative study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

The main focus of this paper is on a particular type of process capability indices, termed C pm in the quality control community, enabling to consider proximity of the process center to the pre-specified target value as well as process inherent variability altogether whilst investigating process capability. In order to take the probabilistic properties of the point estimator used on C pm into account, the key element of this study is to present a generalized Bayes-type approach that allows for the construction of a lower interval limit for the process measure C pm. In comparison to the classical analogue for C pm (built upon the traditional frequentist theory) entailing a non-central chi-square distribution that the practitioners are generally unfamiliar with, the Bayesian method relates simply to the integration of a gamma distribution. The lower Bayesian interval estimate on C pm is also compared with the other three lower confidence bounds posed in the literature and then various experimental studies under a number of process parameter configurations assumed are conducted to illustrate practical guidance about the types of processes for which the Bayesian-based procedure might be advantageous. Directions of how to choose adequate lower confidence limits on C pm for practical use are reported as well.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)444-452
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004

Keywords

  • Bayesian statistical method
  • Classical sampling distribution theory
  • Process capability analysis (PCA)
  • Quality control

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lower bayesian confidence limits on the process capability index cpm: A comparative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this